<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How would you rate my amateur photography?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html</link>
	<description>Photography Tips &#38; Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-85</guid>
		<description>for not having a slr they&#039;re actually pretty good

just try exploring around with different angles and lighting

heres me if you wanna check out some of my stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for not having a slr they&#8217;re actually pretty good</p>
<p>just try exploring around with different angles and lighting</p>
<p>heres me if you wanna check out some of my stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chilliking123</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>chilliking123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-84</guid>
		<description>looks good!

i found the following useful to learn....101 photography tips....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks good!</p>
<p>i found the following useful to learn&#8230;.101 photography tips&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Man (proud uncle)</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Man (proud uncle)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I like &quot;a bugs life&quot; the best, and the cat pictures are good, but I&#039;m just saying that because I love cats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like &#8220;a bugs life&#8221; the best, and the cat pictures are good, but I&#8217;m just saying that because I love cats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Picture by picture here. :)

Reptile:
Part is overexposed (his back) and part is underexposed (his face). If the exposure was more even, I feel more detail would have been picked up. Detail is good in closeups. Remember the rule of thirds.  He&#039;s dead center up and down and his head is a little close to the center for my liking. 

Dragon: 
Because you have a point and shoot, it auto-apertured and created kind of an overall grey effect. Check to see if you can change the aperture on your point and shoot, sometimes you can. 
Curloo:
Love it. Except the leaf in the way. I understand the effect, however right next to his face is a bit distracting. 

Pelican:
Again, beautiful. But rule of thirds. Bit in the middle. 

Passion:
Gorgeous. Great color. Distinct focal point, yet the rest of the photo is still really interesting. In this case, rule of thirds out the window and it&#039;s just fine, in my opinion. 

Above the canopy:
I noticed it&#039;s your brother&#039;s, i&#039;ll talk about it anyway. The color is fantastic. The cables are great leading lines to the mountains. But the horizon is dead center, which I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve figured out is a pet peeve of mine. I think it would have been better as a horizontal picture, landscape wise I mean. With the cables on one of the horizontal thirds and the horizon on the lower vertical third. Just my opinion. 

Butterfly:
I like the mirrored image of the leaves. They&#039;re the same shape as the butterfly. Probably an accident, but one to take credit for. 

The rest didn&#039;t really strike my fancy, but I can see that you&#039;re trying. You have an eye for composition, but you just need to develop it. The best way to do that is to take millions of pictures and do what I just did you your own pictures. What&#039;s good about it? What could improve? And then try to use that new knowledge in your next photo expedition. 

Any questions, let me know!
Keep shooting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture by picture here. <img src='http://amateursnapshots.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Reptile:<br />
Part is overexposed (his back) and part is underexposed (his face). If the exposure was more even, I feel more detail would have been picked up. Detail is good in closeups. Remember the rule of thirds.  He&#8217;s dead center up and down and his head is a little close to the center for my liking. </p>
<p>Dragon:<br />
Because you have a point and shoot, it auto-apertured and created kind of an overall grey effect. Check to see if you can change the aperture on your point and shoot, sometimes you can.<br />
Curloo:<br />
Love it. Except the leaf in the way. I understand the effect, however right next to his face is a bit distracting. </p>
<p>Pelican:<br />
Again, beautiful. But rule of thirds. Bit in the middle. </p>
<p>Passion:<br />
Gorgeous. Great color. Distinct focal point, yet the rest of the photo is still really interesting. In this case, rule of thirds out the window and it&#8217;s just fine, in my opinion. </p>
<p>Above the canopy:<br />
I noticed it&#8217;s your brother&#8217;s, i&#8217;ll talk about it anyway. The color is fantastic. The cables are great leading lines to the mountains. But the horizon is dead center, which I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve figured out is a pet peeve of mine. I think it would have been better as a horizontal picture, landscape wise I mean. With the cables on one of the horizontal thirds and the horizon on the lower vertical third. Just my opinion. </p>
<p>Butterfly:<br />
I like the mirrored image of the leaves. They&#8217;re the same shape as the butterfly. Probably an accident, but one to take credit for. </p>
<p>The rest didn&#8217;t really strike my fancy, but I can see that you&#8217;re trying. You have an eye for composition, but you just need to develop it. The best way to do that is to take millions of pictures and do what I just did you your own pictures. What&#8217;s good about it? What could improve? And then try to use that new knowledge in your next photo expedition. </p>
<p>Any questions, let me know!<br />
Keep shooting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarawr <3 ilu</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarawr <3 ilu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-81</guid>
		<description>There beatiful.
^^ i like them... good job hun </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There beatiful.<br />
^^ i like them&#8230; good job hun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candid Chris</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Candid Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Some are better than others, of course.
Dragon and Passion show good lighting, most of the rest have either hot spots or are washed out.
The shots of the cats and ducks - you are not working in any composition and are getting to close to the subject. 
The butterfly pix are okay, just better than average snapshots.

Just think what having a nice (d)SLR might help. The learning curve takes a rather steep incline, so be prepared for it.

Nice job, keep going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some are better than others, of course.<br />
Dragon and Passion show good lighting, most of the rest have either hot spots or are washed out.<br />
The shots of the cats and ducks &#8211; you are not working in any composition and are getting to close to the subject.<br />
The butterfly pix are okay, just better than average snapshots.</p>
<p>Just think what having a nice (d)SLR might help. The learning curve takes a rather steep incline, so be prepared for it.</p>
<p>Nice job, keep going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noodles_bby</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>noodles_bby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-79</guid>
		<description>wow,
thats greatttt.[:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow,<br />
thats greatttt.[:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [ApraTur3]</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>[ApraTur3]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-78</guid>
		<description>First of all, an SLR camera doesn&#039;t make a photographer.  A passionate eye and a love for capturing life&#039;s images with a lens in general makes a photographer.  A couple of these images stand out enough to show hints of a passionate eye but most of them just don&#039;t have the composition.  Not saying that a professional photographer gets a perfect shot every time but you can tell the difference between your shots and someone who has been in the field a lot longer.  Sometimes all the practice in the world won&#039;t get you anywhere in the dog-eat-dog business that is photography when you don&#039;t have that desirable eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, an SLR camera doesn&#8217;t make a photographer.  A passionate eye and a love for capturing life&#8217;s images with a lens in general makes a photographer.  A couple of these images stand out enough to show hints of a passionate eye but most of them just don&#8217;t have the composition.  Not saying that a professional photographer gets a perfect shot every time but you can tell the difference between your shots and someone who has been in the field a lot longer.  Sometimes all the practice in the world won&#8217;t get you anywhere in the dog-eat-dog business that is photography when you don&#8217;t have that desirable eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: φωτογράφος</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>φωτογράφος</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-77</guid>
		<description>body slams and pile drivers away.....

actually i quite enjoyed your images, good outdoors stuff, some pleasing angles, some not so pleasing, the exposures are a bit bland, some processing could flash them up a bit, compositions arent to bad, some are a bit central,

some nice nature shots there, enjoy making images, have a look at some youtube tutorials maybe on -  (photographic) exposure, composition, view point,  et cetera,  keep having fun

thanks for the share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>body slams and pile drivers away&#8230;..</p>
<p>actually i quite enjoyed your images, good outdoors stuff, some pleasing angles, some not so pleasing, the exposures are a bit bland, some processing could flash them up a bit, compositions arent to bad, some are a bit central,</p>
<p>some nice nature shots there, enjoy making images, have a look at some youtube tutorials maybe on &#8211;  (photographic) exposure, composition, view point,  et cetera,  keep having fun</p>
<p>thanks for the share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Cool! I&#039;m not a photographer myself, but I like you pictures a lot. How do you get close up like that? Anyways, I love how you like to take pictures of nature. Animal pictures are always interesting to me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I&#8217;m not a photographer myself, but I like you pictures a lot. How do you get close up like that? Anyways, I love how you like to take pictures of nature. Animal pictures are always interesting to me <img src='http://amateursnapshots.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  amateursnapshots.com/how-would-you-rate-my-amateur-photography.html/feed ) in 2.60078 seconds, on Sep 6th, 2010 at 9:02 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Sep 6th, 2010 at 10:02 pm UTC -->